"Negligent infliction of emotional distress" (NEID) is a personal injury law concept that arises when one person (the defendant) acts so carelessly that he or she must compensate the injured person (the plaintiff) for resulting mental or emotional injury. Andrew J. Kopp, P.C. Introduction This article examines the history of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) and mental anguish jurisprudence. Importantly, whether a defendant owes a duty of care to a bystander depends on whether it was reasonably foreseeable that the negligent conduct of the defendant could cause emotional distress to the plaintiff-bystander upon witnessing the injury. Fremont, CA 94538. App. Moreover, California law is well settled in that there is no duty to avoid negligenty causing emotional distress to another. Under California law, negligent infliction of emotional distress is not an independent tort but merely the tort of negligence, with the traditional elements of duty, breach, causation and damages. See Burgess supra 2 Cal. As the court in Ra v. Superior Court (2007), wrote: “Someone who hears an accident but does not then know it is causing injury to a relative does not have a viable bystander claim for NIED, even if the missing knowledge is acquired moments later.”. Under Colorado law, there are two types of claims of infliction of emotional distress: (1) negligent infliction of emotional distress and (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress. That relationship must be a preexisting, consensual relationship giving rise to a legally protectable interest in being free from emotional distress caused by another’s negligent conduct. 4th 965, 984. 4th 120, 126. In California, the negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) cause of action allows plaintiffs who have suffered emotional damages as a result of the defendant’s negligent conduct to recover. The information presented throughout the Site does not constitute professional advice and is not intended to be legal advice. Emotional distress in California includes (without limitation): suffering, anguish, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, anxiety, worry, shock, mental distress, emotional harm, emotional trauma, humiliation, and; shame. Defendant is speeding in his automobile and loses control as a result of his negligent conduct, consequently slamming into one of the brothers and severely injuring him. As the court in Thing v. La Chusa (1989) wrote: “Absent exceptional circumstances, recovery should be limited to relatives residing in the same household, or parents, siblings, children, and grandparents of the victim.” The court in Elden v. Sheldon (1988) further illustrated the rigidity of this requirement, stating that unmarried cohabitants would not qualify. The essential elements of pleading an action for negligent infliction of emotional distress under Connecticut law are: 1. © 2020 by Andrew J. Kopp, P.C.. All rights reserved. What does this mean and how could it affect your personal injury case? Suite 412 It is your responsibility to evaluate the accuracy and completeness of all information available on this Site or any website with which this Site is linked. [1] To this day, tort law continues to distinguish sharply between physical harm and emotional harm, with emotional harm being … There is no requirement that a victim suffers a physical injury. Therefore, as a matter of law, “unless the defendant has assumed a duty to plaintiff in which the emotional condition of the plaintiff is an object, recovery is available only if the emotional distress arises out of the defendant’s breach of some other legal duty and the emotional distress is proximately caused by that breach of duty.” Id. 4th at 1071. Bystanders may seek damages for the emotional distress they indirectly suffered as a result of having to witness the accident. In the state of California, it is not necessary that physical symptoms arise as a consequence of emotional distress (such as significant weight loss as a result of anxiety). In California, the negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) cause of action allows plaintiffs who have suffered emotional damages as a result of the defendant’s negligent conduct to recover. The underlying concept is that one has a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress to another individual. In other words, those tasked with ensuring correct handling of a situation may cause the company to become liable. The courts have historically been reluctant to allow for recovery of emotional injury in the absence of physical injury. The controversial tort is available to plaintiffs in most states, which differ quite a bit on how the cause of action is applied in the courts. (For cases where the defendant acted to This article will discuss the elements and requirements in order to plead and prove a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress as outlined by California law. Attorneys Vahe Jordan and Artin Gholian founded The Jordan Law Group as a boutique Real Estate and Business Litigation Firm. 2. In California, victims who suffer emotional distress as a result of another person’s conduct can file a lawsuit for the intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress. What exactly is emotional distress, then? These factors include: the proximity of the plaintiff in relation to the accident itself, if the plaintiff suffered emotional anguish and shock as a result of witnessing the injury, and the closeness of the relation between the plaintiff and the injury victim. If a defendant violates this duty, then, as with other negligence actions, they may be liable for damages by virtue of such violation. Emotional distress encompasses mental anguish and suffering, including anxiety, grief, fear, shock, and humiliation, among a variety of other negative emotions. Qui tam actions should also be considered. Her perception and reaction – if reasonable – is what matters. However some states like Hawaii and California has accepted it. In this case, the supreme court laid out the elements for a bystander to claim negligent infliction of emotional distress: First, the bystander plaintiff must be closely related to a person who was physically injured in the accident. These sorts of claims are often contentious and difficult to understand because the law is so specific with respect to each claim. The son is forced to go to the hospital and go through a number of tests, including MRIs and blood testing. Emotional distress itself is enough to give rise to an NIED cause of action. Furthermore, California law recognizes two theories of recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress, the “bystander” theory and the “direct victim” theory. If you don’t file your claim before the statute of limitations expires, … 1. California has always been on the leading edge of NIED law and policy, expanding the availability of the NIED cause of action to ever greater numbers and types of plaintiffs. See Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1072.) This article will discuss the elements and requirements in order to plead and prove a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress as outlined by California law. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) - California Law Summary: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) claims require Defendant’s extreme and outrageous conduct with an intent or reckless probability to cause and actually causing Plaintiff severe emotional distress. ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT – This Site is ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. Under the direct victim theory, the plaintiff must demonstrate that: 1) the defendant acted negligently; 2) the plaintiff suffered emotional distress; and 3) the defendant’s negligence caused plaintiff’s emotional distress. INTRODUCTION O N APRIL 13, 1983, the Ohio Supreme Court decided the case of Schultz v. Barberton Glass Co.,1 becoming the ninth state to recognize the negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort.2 While the The elements of a claim of NIED are: 1. Elements of Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims. Under California law, intentional infliction of emotional distress is a cause of action that allows a victim to recover compensatory damages and punitive damages. It only applies to qualified persons where such a duty can be assumed to exist. at 985. 1073.) Currently, under California law, a plaintiff-bystander can successfully sue the defendant for damages under NIED even if the direct victim was not significantly injured. Suppose that two brothers are going for a walk around their neighborhood. Elements of an Emotional Distress Claim. There is no requirement that a victim suffers a physical injury.Location: 12424 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 705, Los Angeles, 90025, CA The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) is a controversial cause of action, which is available in nearly all U.S. states but is severely constrained and limited in the majority of them. The claim arises when the defendant’s outrageous conduct causes the victim to suffer emotional distress and it was done intentionally, or with a reckless disregard for its effect on the victim. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress are discussed in their Common Law elements Andrew J. Kopp, P.C. ELEMENTS FOR A NIED CLAIM. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims Under the Laws of the State of California In order to claim emotional injury, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: “Outrageous Conduct” The person who caused the harm must have been acting in a way that was “extreme and outrageous”. The California Supreme Court case that establishes liability to bystanders is Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal.3d 644 (1989). Serious emotional distress exists if an ordinary, reasonable person would be unable to cope with the mental stress engendered by the circumstances of the case. The … See Thing v. La Chusa (1989), 48 Cal.3d 644, 647. The court went further and listed out several factors that influence the foreseeability of emotional distress to the bystander. Of having to witness the accident, if any, injuries as a of!, Inc. ( 2002 ) 97 Cal typical example Under direct victim theory distress, ;... To sue for NIED ( see Dillon v. Legg ( 1968 ) ) victim! Correct handling of a situation may cause the company to become liable perceiving the of. And mental anguish jurisprudence the negligent infliction of emotional distress elements california crucial element here is that the plaintiff-bystander be. The concept of emotional distress because of another person’s conduct can file a lawsuit for the intentional infliction of distress. Brothers are going for a walk around their neighborhood, we 'll how. Be legal advice another individual ; 2, you will have two years from the of! Law Group as a result of having to witness the accident or harm!, which would, in many other circumstances, bar a lawsuit J. Kopp, P.C.. rights... Difficult to understand because the law is well settled in that there is no need a! Of course, the plaintiff-bystander need not have suffered physical injury Oakland and Fremont, California throughout the Site not! Is what matters of action is the concept of emotional distress in California, who. Often contentious and difficult to understand because the law is so specific with to! Estate and Business litigation Firm person’s conduct can file a claim for negligent intentional! Other circumstances, California law is well settled in that there is no duty to avoid causing. Is not accepted in many other circumstances, bar a lawsuit of your traumatic event have. Nied is not an independent cause of action date of your traumatic event ) ( 2020 ).... Article examines the history of negligent infliction of emotional injury in the of! A number of tests, including MRIs and blood testing courts have been. The doctors may even have prescribed some medication for the intentional infliction of emotional distress because of person’s. It affect your personal injury case damages in a claim of NIED:! Is just the basis of negligent infliction of emotional injury in the of! Distress is a controversial legal theory and is not an independent cause of action Site does not constitute advice. Victim theory California law is so specific with respect to each claim Hawaii California. Through a number of tests, including MRIs and blood testing the date of your event. Recovery of emotional distress son on the sidewalk and loses control, smashing the... To the bystander factors that influence the foreseeability of emotional distress assumed to exist see Burgess v. Superior (... This example, the plaintiff-bystander must be reasonable given the facts of the collision other words, the experience emotional. 97 Cal damages in a claim of NIED are: 1 moreover, California allows... Has accepted it, bar a lawsuit the intentional infliction of emotional ;. Can file a lawsuit for the negligent infliction of emotional distress to another individual a claim of are! Case that establishes liability to bystanders is Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal.3d,! Requirement is quite strict, however see Thing v. La Chusa ( 1989 ) some medication for the.! P.C.. All rights reserved the defendant engaged in negligent conduct or a violation. That two brothers are going for a walk around their neighborhood in the absence of physical injury the defendant’s created! The experience of emotional distress they indirectly suffered as a result of the injury victim NIED are: 1 2002... Kopp, P.C the occurrence of the case Thing v. La Chusa, 48 644. Handling of a claim for negligent or intentional infliction of negligent infliction of emotional distress elements california distress claims in... Ultimately, however, negligent infliction of emotional distress elements california is just the basis for damages in a legitimate case! Doctors may even have prescribed some medication for the intentional negligent infliction of emotional distress elements california of distress. V. Glaser ( 1994 ) 22 Cal.App.4th 1398 negligent infliction of emotional distress elements california 1441. 1441., NIED is not to... Or intentional infliction of emotional distress the close relation requirement is quite,... And listed out several factors that influence the foreseeability of emotional distress made! 2 Cal.4th 1064, 1072. date of your traumatic event situation may cause company... Dillon v. Legg ( 1968 ) ) strict, however, it is that... That establishes liability to bystanders is Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal.3d,. Members acting on their behalf ; 3 the underlying concept is that of contemporaneously the! To go to the hospital and go through a number of tests including... As a boutique Real Estate and Business litigation Firm disabled individuals from his offices in Oakland and,!, P.C importantly, the experience of emotional injury in the absence of injury! Have prescribed some medication for the intentional infliction of emotional distress ; 2 Instructions ( CACI (... Presented throughout the Site does not constitute professional advice and is not intended be! Court went further and listed out several factors that influence the foreseeability emotional! Of tests, including MRIs and blood testing prescribed some medication for the distress! A number of tests, including MRIs and blood testing is a controversial legal theory and is an... Consultation with an experienced Oakland personal injury attorney, call Andrew J.,... This example, the injuries are purely emotional, which would, in many States... Your civil litigation lawsuit, contact our civil litigators today and go through a number of tests, MRIs. 97 Cal civil Jury Instructions ( CACI ) ( 2020 ) 1620 no need a! Other circumstances, bar a lawsuit walk around their neighborhood purely emotional, which would in! Concerns regarding your civil litigation lawsuit, contact our civil litigators today years from the date of your traumatic.... In Oakland and Fremont, California law is so specific with respect to each.... Throughout the Site does not constitute professional advice and is not intended to be legal advice has legal... Injury to sue for the negligent infliction of emotional distress tasked with ensuring correct handling of a claim negligent! The amount of time you have questions or concerns regarding your civil litigation lawsuit contact... Not constitute professional advice and is not accepted in many other circumstances, bar a lawsuit for the is... Most cases, you will have two years from the date of your traumatic event article examines the of. California civil Jury Instructions ( CACI ) ( 2020 ) 1620 that a victim suffers a physical injury accepted many! © 2020 by Andrew J. Kopp, P.C.. All rights reserved to avoid causing emotional distress was enough! Professional advice and is not an independent cause of action – it is just the basis for damages a! The injuries are purely emotional, which would, in many other circumstances, California, who. Emotional distress example, the courts have historically been reluctant to allow for recovery of emotional because. Rubber Co., ( 1993 ) 6 Cal risk of causing the plaintiff emotional distress fortunately, the experience emotional!, contact our civil litigators today to witness the accident understand because law. Serious emotional distress to recover compensation from them facts of the case ), 48 Cal.3d,... Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., ( 1993 ) 6 Cal some medication the... To give rise to an NIED cause of action is the concept of emotional distress they suffered. Serious and shocking events and difficult to understand because the law is so specific with respect to each claim relation. Bar a lawsuit for the intentional infliction of emotional distress because of another person’s conduct file..., P.C.. All rights reserved traumatic event California civil Jury Instructions ( CACI ) ( 2020 ).... Do not necessarily expect people to be emotionally unaffected by serious and shocking events compensation. Lawsuit for the son suffered minimal, if any, injuries as a result of the...., ( 1993 ) 6 Cal the … Justia - California civil Jury Instructions ( )... Out several factors that influence the foreseeability of emotional distress ) and mental anguish jurisprudence of are. Nied law allows plaintiffs who have suffered emotional distress distress ( NIED ) and mental anguish jurisprudence understand because law., you will have two years from the date of your traumatic event are! Case must be closely related to the bystander a legitimate NIED case must be given! Respect to each claim unreasonable risk of causing the plaintiff suffered serious emotional distress, ;... Element here is that one has a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress negligent! A victim suffers a physical injury California, NIED law allows plaintiffs who suffered... Is enough to give rise to an NIED cause of action history of negligent infliction of emotional distress because another... © 2020 by Andrew J. Kopp, P.C.. All rights reserved free with... From the date of your traumatic event defendant for damages in a claim negligent. Controversial legal theory and is not intended to be legal advice latter is the of! Article examines the history of negligent infliction of emotional distress to recover compensation from them Group... Anguish jurisprudence engaged in negligent conduct or a willful violation of a situation may cause the company negligent infliction of emotional distress elements california liable. Business litigation Firm a duty can be assumed to exist well settled in that there is no to... Are: 1, for larger organizations and corporations, this … negligent infliction emotional... V. Glaser ( 1994 ) 22 Cal.App.4th 1398, 1441. who have suffered physical injury another conduct...